Reviewer Guidelines

Expectations for peer reviewers in dental research.

• Assess methodological rigor and clinical relevance
• Provide specific, constructive feedback
• Identify ethical or data integrity concerns
• Submit reviews within agreed timelines
• Maintain confidentiality and objectivity

• Clarity of research question and implantology relevance
• Appropriateness of study design and analysis
• Transparency of data and reporting
• Strength of conclusions for clinical practice
• Quality of figures, tables, and imaging evidence

• Confirm clinical protocols are described clearly
• Assess imaging methodology and calibration details
• Check outcome measures for clinical relevance
• Ensure adverse events and limitations are reported

• Brief summary of the manuscript contribution
• Major issues requiring revision
• Minor edits or clarifications
• Recommendation with rationale

Reviews should be specific and actionable, focusing on how the manuscript can be strengthened. Highlight both strengths and limitations to help authors improve clarity and scientific rigor.

If recommendations are conditional, state the essential changes needed for acceptance.

Reviewers must maintain confidentiality, avoid sharing manuscript content, and disclose conflicts of interest. If you identify possible ethical concerns such as duplicated images or unclear consent, notify the editorial office.

All reviews should be constructive, respectful, and focused on improving the manuscript.

Typical reviewer turnaround is 14 to 21 days, which supports the journal's 2 to 4 week first decision target. If more time is needed, contact the editorial office as early as possible.

Recommendations should align with the evidence provided and note any limitations that could affect clinical interpretation.

• Is the clinical question clearly stated?
• Are methods appropriate for the study design?
• Do results support the conclusions?
• Are limitations and biases addressed?
• Is the manuscript aligned with JDOI scope?

If you need clarification on scope or reporting standards, the editorial office can provide guidance to ensure your review aligns with journal expectations.

Early questions reduce delays and help keep decisions consistent.

JDOI supports authors, editors, and reviewers with timely guidance on scope, policies, and workflows. If you need clarification on requirements, data statements, or review timelines, contact the editorial office at [email protected]. We can provide templates, examples, and best-practice recommendations to help you move forward confidently. Our responses typically include next steps, resource links, and a clear point of contact. Early communication helps avoid delays, ensures consistent compliance, and improves the overall publication experience. For database verification, APC documentation, or ManuscriptZone access issues, please email the editorial office with your manuscript title and contact details.