Editorial Policies

Clear policies that protect integrity in dental research publishing.

JDOI editorial decisions are based on scientific merit, methodological quality, and clinical relevance. Editors operate independently from APC considerations to ensure fairness and transparency.

Scope alignment is essential. Manuscripts must connect to dentistry or oral implant outcomes and contribute actionable evidence for clinical or translational practice.

• Initial editorial screening for scope and completeness
• Single-blind peer review by domain specialists
• Decision based on reviewer feedback and editorial judgment
• Revision cycles managed with clear guidance
• Final decision confirmed by senior editorial leadership

Editorial communications, reviewer identities, and manuscript content are treated as confidential. This protects authors and reviewers and supports unbiased evaluation.

Decision letters provide clear rationales to help authors improve their work and understand how outcomes align with JDOI standards.

• Compliance with COPE and ICMJE guidance
• IRB approval and informed consent for human research
• Conflict of interest disclosures for authors and reviewers
• Plagiarism screening for all submissions
• Ethical handling of images and clinical data

Authorship should reflect meaningful contributions to study design, data acquisition, analysis, or writing. All contributors must approve the final manuscript and agree to accountability for the work.

We encourage author contribution statements to clarify roles and support transparency.

Authors must disclose financial or non-financial conflicts that could influence interpretation. Funding sources and sponsor roles should be clearly described.

Editors and reviewers recuse themselves when conflicts exist to preserve impartial evaluation.

JDOI investigates suspected misconduct including duplicate publication, plagiarism, data fabrication, or image manipulation. Concerns are handled in line with established publication ethics guidance.

When issues arise, the editorial office may request raw data, protocols, or additional documentation to validate findings.

Authors are expected to provide data availability statements when appropriate. Transparent methods and data improve reproducibility in dental research.

Clinical trial registration and protocol identifiers should be included when applicable.

Authors receive clear decision letters outlining required changes and review outcomes. This supports efficient revisions and consistent expectations across the journal.

If authors have questions about policy interpretation or reviewer feedback, the editorial office can provide clarification.

• Corrections or retractions issued when needed
• Appeals reviewed by senior editors
• Authorship disputes handled under COPE guidance
• Expressions of concern published when warranted

These safeguards protect the scientific record and maintain trust in JDOI content.

Clear policies ensure consistent editorial decisions and maintain the journal's reputation for high-quality dental scholarship. They also improve transparency for authors and reviewers and reduce misunderstandings during review.

If a situation falls outside standard policy, the editorial office will provide guidance to resolve issues promptly.

Policy updates are communicated through the journal site and editorial office notices. Authors and reviewers are encouraged to review updates before submitting or accepting review invitations.

Adhering to current policies supports consistent editorial outcomes and protects the integrity of the scientific record.

Questions about policy interpretation can be directed to the editorial office.

JDOI supports authors, editors, and reviewers with timely guidance on scope, policies, and workflows. If you need clarification on requirements, data statements, or review timelines, contact the editorial office at [email protected]. We can provide templates, examples, and best-practice recommendations to help you move forward confidently. Our responses typically include next steps, resource links, and a clear point of contact. Early communication helps avoid delays, ensures consistent compliance, and improves the overall publication experience. For database verification, APC documentation, or ManuscriptZone access issues, please email the editorial office with your manuscript title and contact details.