Aim and Scope
Defining the clinical and scientific focus of dentistry and oral implant research.
Evidence That Advances Oral Implant Care
JDOI publishes research that improves implant outcomes, restorative success, and patient centered oral health care.
Journal at a Glance
- ISSN: 2473-1005
- DOI Prefix: 10.14302/issn.2473-1005
- License: CC BY 4.0
- Peer Review: Single-blind
- First Decision: 2-4 weeks from submission
- Publication: After APC confirmation and production
JDOI advances dentistry and oral implantology by publishing research that improves clinical outcomes, strengthens evidence based practice, and accelerates innovation in oral healthcare.
We prioritize studies that connect scientific advances to practical decision making in implant planning, restorative rehabilitation, and patient care.
Submissions should inform clinical protocols, device selection, and patient counseling in real world practice settings.
The journal covers clinical, translational, and applied research in dentistry and oral implantology. Submissions must demonstrate clear relevance to dental outcomes, implant performance, or oral health improvement.
Interdisciplinary studies are welcome when the primary contribution remains anchored in dental science or implantology.
- Dental implantology, osseointegration, and surgical techniques
- Biomaterials, surface treatments, and implant design evaluation
- Periodontology, peri-implant health, and soft tissue management
- Prosthodontics, occlusion, and restorative rehabilitation
- Digital dentistry, CAD/CAM, and guided implant workflows
- Oral pathology, diagnostics, and advanced imaging applications
- Bone augmentation, grafting, and regenerative approaches
- Patient outcomes, esthetics, and quality of life measures
Research on peri-implantitis prevention, diagnosis, and management is within scope when it includes clear clinical outcomes and risk mitigation strategies.
We welcome studies that evaluate maintenance programs, recall schedules, and long term monitoring protocols.
JDOI considers regenerative approaches that support implant stability and bone or soft tissue reconstruction. Studies should describe materials, methods, and clinical applicability.
Submissions that connect regenerative techniques to improved surgical outcomes are encouraged.
Diagnostic imaging research should address accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical decision impact. Comparative studies of imaging modalities and AI assisted interpretation are relevant.
Clear reporting of imaging protocols and calibration improves clinical translation.
We welcome studies that report implant survival, success criteria, complication rates, and long term functional outcomes. Comparative designs and multi center evidence are especially valuable.
Submissions should clearly define outcome measures and follow up timelines.
High impact manuscripts include transparent outcome definitions, follow up durations, and clinically meaningful benchmarks. Survival alone is not sufficient; functional performance and patient experience should be described when possible.
Long term follow up that documents complications, maintenance needs, and revision outcomes strengthens real world applicability and informs evidence based care.
Research on implant materials, coatings, and biomechanical performance must include reproducible methods and clinically relevant endpoints. We encourage studies that link material behavior to patient outcomes.
Laboratory or bench studies are considered when they clearly inform clinical practice or device safety.
Digital workflows, AI assisted planning, and advanced imaging technologies are core areas of interest. Submissions should describe accuracy, reliability, and clinical implementation considerations.
Studies that compare digital and conventional approaches are encouraged.
We consider research on flap design, guided surgery, immediate placement, and loading protocols when supported by robust outcome data.
Rehabilitation studies should address occlusal stability, esthetic outcomes, and long term prosthetic performance.
Manuscripts should explain how findings improve patient care, reduce complications, or enhance access to effective oral health interventions.
Studies that include diverse populations and real world practice settings are particularly valuable.
We value studies that report patient characteristics and clinical context, including comorbidities, smoking status, bone quality, and periodontal history. These details help clinicians interpret outcomes and apply findings safely.
Research in medically complex or aging populations is welcome when methodology and risk reporting are transparent and outcomes are clearly framed.
JDOI welcomes innovative research that advances implant planning, diagnostics, and rehabilitation. We encourage work that evaluates new tools or methods while maintaining clinical safety and reproducibility.
Examples include AI assisted imaging, digital workflows, regenerative techniques, and novel implant surfaces that show measurable clinical benefit.
- Randomized or pragmatic clinical trials
- Prospective and retrospective cohort studies
- Systematic reviews and meta analyses
- Clinical technique evaluations with outcome reporting
- Biomechanical or material performance studies
- Case series with clear methodology and follow up
Preclinical or laboratory studies are considered when they directly inform clinical decisions in implantology or restorative dentistry. Methods should be rigorous, reproducible, and clearly linked to anticipated clinical impact.
Submissions should explain how bench or animal findings translate to implant stability, tissue response, or long term performance in human care.
Studies that are purely clinical pharmacotherapy without a dental or implant contribution, or biological research without oral health relevance, are outside the scope of JDOI.
Submissions must demonstrate clear dental or implant implications to be considered.
- CONSORT for randomized trials
- STROBE for observational studies
- PRISMA for systematic reviews
- CARE for case reports when applicable
All clinical research must include ethics approval, informed consent, and transparent reporting of conflicts of interest. Trials should include registration identifiers when applicable.
Data availability statements should describe access pathways, repository links, or justified restrictions.
Authors should report adverse events, complications, and risk mitigation strategies when relevant. Clear reporting supports clinical adoption and patient safety.
Studies that compare risk profiles across techniques or materials are especially valuable for clinical decision making.
JDOI encourages data sharing and protocol transparency to strengthen reproducibility. Provide repository links, code, or access pathways when possible.
If data sharing is restricted, explain the reason and provide a method for qualified access.
Cross disciplinary work is welcome when the central contribution advances dental science or implant outcomes. Studies that are purely clinical pharmacotherapy or unrelated biological research without a clear dental contribution are out of scope.
If you are unsure about scope fit, contact the editorial office for guidance.
- Clear dental or implant relevance stated in the abstract
- Defined outcomes that measure clinical impact
- Methods align with accepted reporting standards
- Patient safety and ethics approvals documented
- Data or protocol transparency addressed
- Outcomes reported with follow up duration
- Clinical applicability discussed in conclusions
- Limitations and risks reported transparently
We prioritize evidence that can be translated into clinical guidelines, improved surgical techniques, or better patient outcomes. Clear discussion of clinical relevance strengthens scope fit and editorial evaluation.
JDOI supports authors, editors, and reviewers with timely guidance on scope, policies, and workflows. If you need clarification on requirements, data statements, or review timelines, contact the editorial office at [email protected]. We can provide templates, examples, and best-practice recommendations to help you move forward confidently. Our responses typically include next steps, resource links, and a clear point of contact. Early communication helps avoid delays, ensures consistent compliance, and improves the overall publication experience. For database verification, APC documentation, or ManuscriptZone access issues, please email the editorial office with your manuscript title and contact details.
Submit Dentistry Research With Impact
Align your manuscript with our scope and submit through ManuscriptZone.