Journal of Dentistry And Oral Implants

Journal of Dentistry And Oral Implants

Journal of Dentistry And Oral Implants – Reviewer Register

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript

Reviewer Registration

The Journal of Dentistry and Oral Implants welcomes expressions of interest from researchers, clinicians, and methodological experts who can contribute informed, independent peer review.

Register your professional profile for consideration when a manuscript aligns with your subject expertise, research experience, and availability.

Reviewer profiles are assessed for expertise, suitability, and relevance to individual manuscripts. Registration does not guarantee a review assignment or an editorial appointment.

Relevant expertise Applicants should have current knowledge in dentistry, oral health, oral implantology, or a closely related discipline.
Independent judgement Reviews should be objective, evidence-based, constructive, and professionally expressed.
Manuscript-specific matching Reviewer invitations are considered according to the subject, methods, and requirements of each submission.

Why review for JDOI

Peer reviewers help editors assess the scientific quality, methodological rigour, clinical relevance, and presentation of submitted research.

A clear and constructive review also helps authors identify important strengths, limitations, and opportunities to improve their work.

Reviewers provide specialist advice to the editorial process. Final editorial decisions remain the responsibility of the journal.

Who should register

Registration is suitable for researchers and experienced practitioners who can provide informed and impartial assessment in areas relevant to the journal.

Subject and clinical expertise

  • Academic, research, or clinical experience in dentistry or oral health
  • Knowledge of oral implantology, periodontology, forensic dentistry, or another relevant specialty
  • Current scholarly activity, publication experience, or appropriate clinical research experience

Research and methodological expertise

  • Ability to evaluate study design, methods, analysis, and interpretation
  • Familiarity with relevant clinical, laboratory, imaging, biomaterials, or evidence-synthesis methods
  • Ability to distinguish well-supported conclusions from unsupported claims
  • Capacity to provide a careful review within an agreed deadline

Reviewer responsibilities

Reviewers should accept an invitation only when the manuscript falls within their area of competence and they have sufficient time to complete the assessment.

  • Assess the research question, methods, analysis, interpretation, and clinical or scholarly relevance
  • Provide specific, constructive, and evidence-based comments
  • Distinguish essential concerns from optional recommendations
  • Identify significant limitations, unsupported conclusions, or ethical concerns
  • Communicate respectfully and focus criticism on the work rather than the authors
  • Submit the review within the timeline agreed with the editorial office
  • Notify the journal promptly when circumstances affect availability

Confidentiality and conflicts of interest

Confidentiality

Manuscripts, data, correspondence, and other unpublished material received during peer review must not be shared, discussed, or used outside the review process.

Conflicts of interest

Reviewers should disclose any financial, professional, institutional, academic, or personal relationship that could affect, or reasonably appear to affect, an independent assessment.

When a relevant conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the invitation or seek guidance from the editorial office before proceeding.

Information applicants should provide

A complete and current profile helps the editorial team assess expertise and identify suitable manuscript-review matches.

  • Full name, current role, institutional affiliation, and contact information
  • Specific subject areas and specialist keywords
  • Research methods and study designs they are qualified to assess
  • Recent publications, research activity, or relevant clinical experience
  • Previous peer-review experience, where applicable
  • Preferred manuscript topics and current availability

Registration and assessment

  1. Complete your profile

    Register through ManuscriptZone and provide accurate professional and institutional information.

  2. Describe your expertise

    Identify your specialist subjects, methodological strengths, research interests, and relevant experience as precisely as possible.

  3. Editorial assessment

    The editorial team reviews each profile for relevance, expertise, professional standing, and suitability for the journal's reviewing needs.

  4. Invitation based on manuscript fit

    When a potentially suitable manuscript is received, the editorial office may contact reviewers whose expertise matches the submission.

Register your reviewer profile

Researchers and clinicians with relevant expertise are invited to submit their details for editorial consideration.

Registration does not guarantee assignments. Each invitation is based on the subject, methods, and requirements of a specific manuscript.