Editor Resources
Tools and guidance for editors of Public Health International (JPHI).
Resources that support high quality decisions
Editors at Public Health International have access to practical resources that support fair, efficient peer review in population health, epidemiology, prevention science, health systems, and global health policy.
These resources help standardize decisions, improve author communication, and maintain ethical standards.
Reviewer selection guide
Tips for identifying qualified reviewers and managing conflicts.
Decision templates
Structured decision letters that improve clarity for authors.
Ethics checklist
A quick reference for common integrity and compliance issues.
Reporting guidance
Pointers to reporting standards and best practice checklists.
We value timely contributions and clear communication. Consistent workflows help editors, reviewers, and authors collaborate effectively while protecting the integrity of the record.
Strong participation builds a trusted community. Your expertise improves decision quality and raises the standard of scholarship across the journal.
We encourage transparency in conflicts of interest and a professional, respectful tone in all review interactions.
If you need support or have questions, the editorial office is available to guide you through the process.
Service in these roles is recognized as an important contribution to the field and to open access publishing.
We value timely contributions and clear communication. Consistent workflows help editors, reviewers, and authors collaborate effectively while protecting the integrity of the record.
Strong participation builds a trusted community. Your expertise improves decision quality and raises the standard of scholarship across the journal.
We encourage transparency in conflicts of interest and a professional, respectful tone in all review interactions.
If you need support or have questions, the editorial office is available to guide you through the process.
Service in these roles is recognized as an important contribution to the field and to open access publishing.
We value timely contributions and clear communication. Consistent workflows help editors, reviewers, and authors collaborate effectively while protecting the integrity of the record.
Strong participation builds a trusted community. Your expertise improves decision quality and raises the standard of scholarship across the journal.
We encourage transparency in conflicts of interest and a professional, respectful tone in all review interactions.
If you need support or have questions, the editorial office is available to guide you through the process.
Service in these roles is recognized as an important contribution to the field and to open access publishing.
We value timely contributions and clear communication. Consistent workflows help editors, reviewers, and authors collaborate effectively while protecting the integrity of the record.
Strong participation builds a trusted community. Your expertise improves decision quality and raises the standard of scholarship across the journal.
We encourage transparency in conflicts of interest and a professional, respectful tone in all review interactions.
If you need support or have questions, the editorial office is available to guide you through the process.
Service in these roles is recognized as an important contribution to the field and to open access publishing.
We value timely contributions and clear communication. Consistent workflows help editors, reviewers, and authors collaborate effectively while protecting the integrity of the record.
Strong participation builds a trusted community. Your expertise improves decision quality and raises the standard of scholarship across the journal.
