Reviewer Guidelines
Essential guidelines for providing expert peer review of gastroenterology and digestive disorders research at JDDD.
Excellence in Peer Review
JDDD reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published gastroenterology research. These guidelines outline expectations for constructive, thorough, and timely manuscript evaluation to support authors and advance digestive health science.
Reviewers are expected to provide objective, constructive evaluation of manuscripts within their area of GI expertise.
- Respond to review invitations promptly, accepting or declining within three days
- Complete reviews within the agreed timeframe, typically fourteen days
- Evaluate scientific rigor, methodology, and interpretation of results
- Provide constructive feedback to help authors improve their work
- Maintain confidentiality of manuscript content and author information
- Disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect objectivity
Scientific Quality
Assess whether study design and methodology are appropriate for the research question in gastroenterology. Evaluate statistical analysis, data presentation, and whether conclusions are supported by results.
Originality and Impact
Consider the novelty of findings and potential impact on digestive disease diagnosis or treatment. Assess contribution to existing gastroenterology knowledge and clinical significance.
Reviews should include a summary of the manuscript, major concerns requiring revision, minor suggestions, and clear recommendation. Provide specific, actionable feedback to help authors improve their GI research manuscripts.
Report suspected plagiarism, data fabrication, or ethical concerns to the editor confidentially. Do not use manuscript content for personal advantage. Avoid harsh or personal criticism in reviews of gastroenterology submissions.
Join Our Reviewer Network
Contribute your gastroenterology expertise to peer review.
Register as Reviewer
