<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JWRH</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Women's Reproductive Health</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2381-862X</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JWRH-17-1758</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2381-862X.jwrh-17-1758</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Placenta Previa with History of Previous Caesarean Delivery – an Obstetrician's Nightmare</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Mazumder</surname>
            <given-names>U</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1808810460">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Rouf</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1808810460">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Sarkar</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1808811036">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1808808588">*</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1808810460">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka , Bangladesh,  </addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1808811036">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Head Department of Neurosurgery, Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College, Dhaka,</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1808809884">
        <label/>
        <addr-line> Bangladesh</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1808808588">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>
          <bold>Corresponding author</bold>
        </addr-line>
      </aff>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Qiuqin</surname>
            <given-names>Tang</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1808651140">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1808651140">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
  Dr Saumitra Sarkar MS<addr-line>, Associate Professor and Head Department of Neurosurgery</addr-line><addr-line>Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College Dhaka, Bangladesh</addr-line>, EMAIL: <email>saumitra_nsurg@yahoo.com</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1809715596">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2017-10-29">
        <day>29</day>
        <month>10</month>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>33</fpage>
      <lpage>38</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>06</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2017</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>22</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2017</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>29</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2017</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Mazumder U, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/jwrh/article/611">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/jwrh/article/611</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <sec id="idm1808654524">
          <title>Background: </title>
          <p>The nature of placenta previa can be unpredictable and harsh on the mother and baby. These complications are often unpredictable, unpreventable and often leave the labour ward team in a dilemma. This Obstetricians' nightmare is fortunately a rare complication. The frequency of placenta previa at the time of delivery average 1/200 births i.e. 0.5%. Placenta previa is still an important cause of maternal and fetal death in our country. The risk factors are Advanced Maternal age, Multi parity, Previous Cesarean Section, Multiple gestation, Previous Abortions, Previous intrauterine surgery, placenta previa in previous pregnancy, Smoking.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1808656468">
          <title>Objective:  </title>
          <p>Identification of risk factors, the feto-maternal outcome and complications of patients having placenta previa with previous caesarean section.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1808655676">
          <title>Methodology:  </title>
          <p>This cross sectional study was conducted from July 2012 to June 2015 in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department, Dhaka Medical College hospital. 100 patients of placenta previa were included in this study. Non-probability purposive sampling method was used for selection of patients.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1808656252">
          <title>Results:</title>
          <p><bold/>In this study, Socio-demographic profiles, Identification of risk factors, the feto-maternal outcome and complications of patients having placenta previa were assessed. The frequency of placenta previa associated with previous cesarean section was 61%. In demographic profiles of the patients in this study - with a history of previous caesarean section, 78.7% patients were in the age group 26-35. Multiparity was predominant on scarred uterus group (63.9%). Here, demonstrated that &gt; 2 previous history of caesarean section was associated with 80.3% of placenta previa. Regarding maternal outcome, complications like massive haemorrhage, ureteral injury, bladder injury, wound infection, DIC, maternal and perinatal mortality  were more in the scarred patients than in the unscarred patients. In our study, 29.5% of morbid adhesion of placenta observed in scarred uterus.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="idm1808627932">
          <title>Conclusions: </title>
          <p>There is significant association of placenta previa with previous cesarean delivery. So, Careful monitoring of high risk pregnancies is of utmost importance. Avoidance of unnecessary caesarean sections and early week’s pregnancy terminations can minimize the Obstetricians' nightmare.</p>
        </sec>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Placenta previa</kwd>
        <kwd>Postpartum haemorrhage</kwd>
        <kwd>maternal outcome</kwd>
        <kwd>Scarred and uuscarred uteru</kwd>
        <kwd>Caesarean section</kwd>
        <kwd>Obstetricians' nightmare</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="0"/>
        <table-count count="8"/>
        <page-count count="6"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1808626924" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The nature of placenta previa can be unpredictable and harsh on the mother and baby. These complications are often unpredictable, unpreventable and often leave the labour ward team in a dilemma. Nobody likes to be in the 'red' whether it is the bank account or in exam result. Similarly in obstetrics, doctors do not enjoy seeing abnormal vaginal bleeding in the antenatal period. Nerve wrecking decisions have to be taken depending on the severity.  This Obstetricians' nightmare is fortunately a rare complication. 2 -5% of all pregnancies, approximately one-third are due to placenta previa. The frequency of placenta previa at the time of delivery average 1/200 births i.e. 0.5%. Placenta previa is still an important cause of maternal and fetal death in our country. The risk factors are Advanced Maternal age, Multiparity, Previous Cesarean Section, Multiple gestation, Previous Abortions, Previous intrauterine surgery, PP (placenta previa) in previous pregnancy, Smoking.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1808626636">
      <title>The Aim of the Present Study:</title>
      <p>Identification of risk factors, the feto-maternal outcome and complications of patients having placenta previa with previous caesarean section.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1808627788" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Materials &amp; Method</title>
      <p>This cross sectional study was conducted from July 2012 to June 2015 in Obstetrics and Gynaecology department, Dhaka Medical College hospital. 100 patients of placenta previa were included in this study. It was non-probability purposive sampling method. </p>
      <p>The diagnosis of placenta previa for this study was based on sonographic diagnosis during the third trimester at 28 wks gestation or more. Furthermore the diagnosis was confirmed by direct inspection of placental location at the time of caesarean section. The exclusion criteria were incomplete medical records, uncertain gestational age, and placental abruption. </p>
      <p> After selection of patients, two groups were made.</p>
      <p>Group A - Patients of placenta previa with history of previous caesarean delivery (Scarred Uterus)</p>
      <p>Group B (Control)-Patients of placenta previa without history of previous caesarean delivery (Unscarred Uterus)-</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1808625988" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>Placenta praevia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in both the developed and developing countries like Bangladesh. The present study showed a strong association of placenta praevia with cesarean section. The frequency of placenta praevia with previous cesarean section came out 61% which is very high (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1809315132">Table 1</xref>), that is clearly consistent with other renowned studies regarding this topic. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809546068">1</xref></p>
      <p>Similar results were also obtained in a study during the period of 1977-1983 in Loss Angeles hospital series <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809609732">2</xref>. These investigators found the incidence of placenta praevia to be 9.8 per 1000 among women with previous cesarean delivery and 2.6 per 1000 among women without such a history.</p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809315132">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Incidence of placenta previa(n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Stages</td>
              <td>Frequency</td>
              <td>Percentage</td>
              <td>P Value</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Group A(Scarred Uterus)</td>
              <td>61</td>
              <td>61%</td>
              <td>&lt;0.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Group B(Unscarred Uterus)</td>
              <td>39</td>
              <td>39%</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Total</td>
              <td>100</td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809288132">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Socio-demographic profile of two groups(n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Parameters</td>
              <td>Group A scarred Uterus(n=61) No.(%)</td>
              <td>Group B Unscarred Uterus(n=39) No.(%)</td>
              <td>P value</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">Age Group(years)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>16-25</td>
              <td>11(18.0%)</td>
              <td>11(28.2%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>26-35</td>
              <td>48(78.7%)</td>
              <td>27(69.2%)</td>
              <td>0.992<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>36-45</td>
              <td>02(3.3%)</td>
              <td>01(2.6%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Mean±SD</td>
              <td>28.16±3.96</td>
              <td>28.15±6.12</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">Parity</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Nulliparous</td>
              <td>00(00%)</td>
              <td>07(17.9%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>1-4 para</td>
              <td>39(63.9%)</td>
              <td>22(56.4%)</td>
              <td>0.164<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>&gt;5 para</td>
              <td>22(36.1%)</td>
              <td>10(25.6%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">Socio economic status</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Low</td>
              <td>28(45.9%)</td>
              <td>17(17.9%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Middle</td>
              <td>22(36.1%)</td>
              <td>12(25.6%)</td>
              <td>0.463<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Upper Middle</td>
              <td>11(57.4%)</td>
              <td>10(56.4%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td colspan="4">Educational Status</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Illiteracy</td>
              <td>5(8.2%)</td>
              <td>2(5.1%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Primary</td>
              <td>17(27.9%)</td>
              <td>14(35.9%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>SSC</td>
              <td>21(34.4%)</td>
              <td>14(35.9%)</td>
              <td>0.597<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>HSC</td>
              <td>17(27.9%)</td>
              <td>7(17.9%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Graduate</td>
              <td>1(1.6%)</td>
              <td>2(5.1%)</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809210660">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Obstetric Profile (n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (Scarred Uterus)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group B (Unscarred) </bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>P value</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold> </bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=39)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Antenatal Check Up Regular</bold>
              </td>
              <td>32 (52.5%)</td>
              <td>22 (56.4%)</td>
              <td>0.699<sup>NS</sup></td>
              <td> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Irregular</bold>
              </td>
              <td>29 (47.5%)</td>
              <td>17 (43.6%)</td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Gestational weeks</bold>
              </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>&lt;30</bold>
              </td>
              <td>3(4.9%)</td>
              <td>5(12.8%)</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>31-34</bold>
              </td>
              <td>11(18.0%)</td>
              <td>5(12.8%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.313<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>35-37</bold>
              </td>
              <td>28(45.9%)</td>
              <td>21(53.8%)</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>&lt;37</bold>
              </td>
              <td>19(31.1%)</td>
              <td>8(20.5%)</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Mean±SD</bold>
              </td>
              <td>35.87±2.55</td>
              <td>35.21±3.08</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Location of Placenta</bold>
              </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Anterior</bold>
              </td>
              <td>32 (52.5%)</td>
              <td>22 (56.4%)</td>
              <td colspan="2">0.699<sup>NS</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>posterior</bold>
              </td>
              <td>29 (47.5%)</td>
              <td>17 (43.6%)</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Total</bold>
              </td>
              <td>61 (100%)</td>
              <td>39 (100%)</td>
              <td colspan="2"> </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809130292">
        <label>Table 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Identified Risk factors for scarred uterus (n=61)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold>Number of caesarean section</bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (Scarred Uterus)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Percentage (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>P value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Previous One</bold>
              </td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>19.70%</td>
              <td>&lt;0.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Previous Two</bold>
              </td>
              <td>33</td>
              <td>54.10%</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Previous Three</bold>
              </td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>26.20%</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809066948">
        <label>Table 5.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Identified Risk factors (n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (Scarred Uterus)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group B (Unscarred)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>P value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=39)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Previous abortion (Spontaneous/ Induced)</bold>
              </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td>NS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Present</bold>
              </td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>19</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Absent</bold>
              </td>
              <td>33</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>H/O previous Placenta Previa</bold>
              </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td> </td>
              <td>NS</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Present</bold>
              </td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>19</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Absent</bold>
              </td>
              <td>33</td>
              <td>5</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1809029828">
        <label>Table 6.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Maternal complications &amp; outcome (n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Parameters</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (</bold>
                <bold>Scarred )</bold>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group B (Unscarred)</bold>
                <bold>(n=39)</bold>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Massive obstetric </bold>
                <bold>haemorrhage</bold>
              </td>
              <td>42(68.9%)</td>
              <td>23(59.0%)</td>
              <td>0.312<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Bladder injury</bold>
              </td>
              <td>27(44.3%)</td>
              <td>14(35.9%)</td>
              <td>0.407<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Ureteral injury</bold>
              </td>
              <td>3(4.9%)</td>
              <td>1(2.6%)</td>
              <td>0.558<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1808946684">
        <label>Table 7.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Maternal complications &amp; outcome in scarred uterus (n=61)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold>Parameter</bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (Scarred Uterus)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Percentage (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>P value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td/>
              <td>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td/>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>P. </bold>
                <bold>Accreta</bold>
              </td>
              <td>12</td>
              <td>19.70%</td>
              <td>&lt;0.05</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>P. Increta</bold>
              </td>
              <td>33</td>
              <td>54.10%</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>P. </bold>
                <bold>Percreta</bold>
              </td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>26.20%</td>
              <td/>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Total</bold>
              </td>
              <td>61</td>
              <td>100%</td>
              <td> </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1808986284">
        <label>Table 8.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Comparison of Foetal outcomes in two groups (n=100)</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Foetal</bold>
                <bold>outcome</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group A (Scarred Uterus)</bold>
                <bold>(n=61)</bold>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Group B (Unscarred Uterus) </bold>
                <bold>(n=39)</bold>
                <bold>No. (%)</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>p value</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Preterm</bold>
              </td>
              <td>23(37.7%)</td>
              <td>20(51.3%)</td>
              <td>0.181<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Low birth weight</bold>
              </td>
              <td>24(39.3%)</td>
              <td>19(48.7%)</td>
              <td>0.256<sup>ns</sup></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <p>If we look at the demographic profiles of the patients in this study - with a history of previous caesarean section, 78.7% patients were in the age group 26-35. Similar results were found by Tuzović et al.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809625396">3</xref>. Sclerotic changes in the intramyometrial arteries with increasing age may contribute to placenta previa by reducing blood supply in the placenta. Moreover Hasegawa et al<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809404956">4</xref>. have mentioned that advanced maternal age is an independent risk factor of massive hemorrhage during cesarean section in women with placenta previa.</p>
      <p>Multiparity was predominant on scarred uterus group (63.9%). It has been mentioned as a risk factor by previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809408988">5</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809625396">3</xref>. No significant associations of placenta previa with socio-economic status or religion have been found in this study. Usta et al <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809406684">6</xref> have demonstrated parallel results.</p>
      <p>In addition our study has also demonstrated that previous history of abortions was associated with placenta previa. 54.1% cases of the scarred group &amp; 48.7% of the unscarred group had history of abortion previously.  Johnson et al <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809397044">7</xref>) and Hendricks et al<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809394812">8</xref> also found similar results.</p>
      <p>Regarding maternal outcome, complications like massive haemorrhage, ureteral injury, bladder injury were more in the scarred patients than in the unscarred patients. In our study, 54.1% were P. accreta type. Another study carried out in Jordan University of science and technology shows that placenta praevia is higher among gravida &gt;4, para &gt;3 and previous caesarean section and no increased in incidence of placenta praevia with increasing maternal age and previous abortion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1809383604">9</xref></p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1808370156" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The nature of placenta previa can be unpredictable and harsh on the mother and baby. It is concluded that there is significant association of placenta previa with previous cesarean delivery. Also It demonstrates the feto-maternal outcome and complications associated with placeta previa.</p>
      <p>So, Careful monitoring of high risk pregnancies is of utmost importance. Avoidance of unnecessary caesarean sections and early week’s pregnancy terminations can minimize the Obstetricians' nightmare. </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1809546068">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Dashe</surname>
            <given-names>J S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>McIntire</surname>
            <given-names>D D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ramus</surname>
            <given-names>R M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Santos-Ramos</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Twickler</surname>
            <given-names>D M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>Obstet Gynecol</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          <fpage>692</fpage>
          <lpage>697</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809609732">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Clark</surname>
            <given-names>S L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Koonings</surname>
            <given-names>P P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Phelan</surname>
            <given-names>J P</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Placenta previa/accreta and prior cesarean section</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1985</year>
          </date>
          <source>Obstet Gynecol</source>
          <volume>66</volume>
          <fpage>89</fpage>
          <lpage>92</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809625396">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Tuzović</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Djelmis</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ilijić</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Obstetric risk factors associated with placenta previa development: case-control study</article-title>
          <source>Croatian Medical Journal.2003Dec;</source>
          <volume>44</volume>
          <issue>6</issue>
          <fpage>728</fpage>
          <lpage>33</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809404956">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hasegawa</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Matsuoka</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ichizuka</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mimura</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Sekizawa</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Farina</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Okai</surname>
            <given-names>T</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Predisposing factors for massive hemorrhage during Cesarean section in patients with placenta previa.UltrasoundObstetGynecol.2009Jul;34(1): 80-4.15.Usta IM,Hobeika EM,Musa AA,Gabriel GE,Nassar AH.Placenta previa-accreta:risk factors and complications.Am J Obstet Gynecol.2005Sep;193(3Pt2):</article-title>
          <fpage>1045</fpage>
          <lpage>9</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809408988">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Gilliam</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rosenberg</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            <given-names>F</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>ObstetGynecol</source>
          <volume>99</volume>
          <fpage>976</fpage>
          <lpage>80</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809406684">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Usta</surname>
            <given-names>I M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Hobeika</surname>
            <given-names>E M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Musa</surname>
            <given-names>A A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Gabriel</surname>
            <given-names>G E</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Nassar</surname>
            <given-names>A H</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Placenta previa-accreta: risk factors and complications</article-title>
          <source>Am J Obstet Gynecol.2005Sep;193(3Pt2):</source>
          <fpage>1045</fpage>
          <lpage>9</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809397044">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
            <given-names>L G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Mueller</surname>
            <given-names>B A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Daling</surname>
            <given-names>J R</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The relationship of placenta previa and history of induced abortion</article-title>
          <source>Int J Gynaecol Obstet.2003May;</source>
          <volume>81</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>191</fpage>
          <lpage>8</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809394812">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hendricks</surname>
            <given-names>M S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Chow</surname>
            <given-names>Y H</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Bhagavath</surname>
            <given-names>B</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Previous cesarean section and abortion as risk factors for developing placenta previa</article-title>
          <source>J Obstet Gynecol Res.1999Apr;</source>
          <volume>25</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>137</fpage>
          <lpage>42</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1809383604">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Zaideh</surname>
            <given-names>S M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Abu-Heija</surname>
            <given-names>A T</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>El-Jallad</surname>
            <given-names>M F</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Placenta praevia and accreta: analysis of a two-year experience</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <source>Gynecol Obstet Invest</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          <fpage>96</fpage>
          <lpage>98</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
