Depression, now considered among the most disabling health challenges facing many in the older adult population can occur as a definable long standing health trait if certain clear diagnostic criteria are met or as a reactive mood state of varying magnitude and chronicity that often accompanies those diseases most prevalent in older adults, such as osteoarthritis 1.

Currently said to occur in at least one third of older adults 2, it is predicted to be among the foremost disablers in this rapidly increasing age group by 2030 in its own right 34, but is possibly likely to be exacerbated in those cases having unrelenting painful disabling osteoarthritis of one or more freely moving joints such as the knee, but not always been effectively managed in clinical settings 1. Alternately, even if depression is not deemed noteworthy in many cases with varying degrees of osteoarthritis, or not discussed as an osteoarthritis co-factor specifically 5, the disease itself which impacts the lives of many older adults significantly and severely as a standalone painful often incapacitating and unrelenting incurable condition may yet engender feelings of depression that add to their burden 678, no matter where subjects with osteoarthritis are studied 9.

This does not include those features that can contribute to both health challenges such as obesity, especially when combined with prolonged depression 10, multiple social, functional, and occupational challenges and restrictions, and knowledge that unrelieved osteoarthritis can foster depressive symptoms, and with this excess osteoarthritis pain and a cycle of increasing and progressive disability 6. In an era of artificial intelligence, and its application to surgery, and drug development, the question arises as to whether this potentially interactive association is especially important to identify and intervene upon.

The pervasive idea that osteoarthritis is inevitable, and relatively untreatable with the exception of pharmacologic drugs, injections, and surgery may of course prove very stressful to contemplate in its own right among many in the aging population and its public health burden may be compounded if depressive features of the disease remain undermined. Clearly, if one takes into account results of a recent preclinical study showing the presence of chronic pain in young adult mice has the propensity to induce mood alterations and supra-spinal observable biochemical changes as well as aggravating alterations already evident in older adult animals, it appears even young adults may incur more disadvantage in later life if this topic remains understudied and thus is often ignored.

Moreover, although often deemed to be an emotional and possibly controllable emotional response or trait feature of some elderly persons, treatment with morphine known to counteract pain, while preventing the development or minimizing possible pain derived anxio-depressive disorders and nerve inflammation 11, is of course addictive and its usage is fraught with dire consequences in many cases 12.

Another intriguing novel finding is that there appears to be an observable bidirectional association between osteoarthritis and multiple psychiatric disorders, as well as findings of a shared genetic architectures between knee osteoarthritis and depression/stress-related disorders, thus providing a possible array of unconventional targets that might be pursued as far as furthering an insightful mechanistic exploration of this topic and its intervention potential 13.

In the interim therefore it seems reasonable to assert that unrelieved states of suffering, including feelings of hopelessness, and low self-worth, may in turn, increase or produce unwanted stress and frustration levels, while adversely impacting coping ability, sleep, energy levels, and appetite, as well as serving as a risk factor for pain, bone loss, osteoporotic fractures 14. cardiovascular disease 15 obesity or frailty, social isolation 16, social strain 8, or poor life quality 1718. The available evidence further identifies depressive symptoms, intolerable pain perceptions and pain self-efficacy along with possible negative self-perceptions, fears of disfigurement and dependence as mechanisms partially explaining the cross-sectional association between insomnia symptoms and pain in people with osteoarthritis that might foster symptoms of depression in their own right 19. 

In light of the severe impact of osteoarthritis of any joint, plus excessive symptomatic as well as excess actual biological depression as mentioned above, and its possible unique and combined detrimental impact on motivation, as well as health seeking and promoting behaviors, as well as intervention efficacy, this mini review elected to selectively focus on whether initiatives to minimize osteoarthritis and depression have yet emerged to any degree, given the fairly well established observations that predates this current 2023 time period and a failure to advance osteoarthritis or depressive symptom care to any meaningful degree via non pharmacologic means.

It investigated whether:

a. We have solid evidence for or against recommendations to address emotional factors in osteoarthritis, including stress and coping

b. Whether the data indicate if the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping20 can offer-an explanatory tool and intervention approach to advance osteoarthritis understandings and care, and if so in what regard.

While other frameworks exist, this aforementioned health behavior explanatory and guiding framework developed by Lazarus and Folkman 20 argues that stress or stressors –such as a physical or cognitive disease- are often complex and may be influenced by personal as well as environmental factors that impact health and the individual’s vulnerability to further stress and disease resolution or exacerbation. This is because it helps to explain and predict how people adapt or do not adapt to chronic illness and how to influence some moderators or at least mitigate some harmful stress impacts 2021.

To attain the aims of this review, we attempted to locate salient data housed on PUBMED and GOOGLE SCHOLAR, Science Direct, and PubMedCentral using the key terms, depression/older adult/osteoarthritis. All forms of publication were deemed acceptable if they addressed the topics of interest noted above and there were no yearly or methodological restrictions. The most salient articles related to the topic were duly examined and those that were noteworthy are presented in narrative form. All modes of application employed in the various research studies were accepted as valid, as were all definitions of depression. Moreover, since the article was designed to serve as a general one to introduce the topic, rather than a systematic review, it did not consider any of the currently reported research endeavors in depth, but rather the goals was to present a snapshot of the prevailing trends in this realm and the potential of this modality for clinical purposes.

Key concepts of the Transactional Stress Model such primary and secondary cognitive appraisals of threat, perceptions of desired solutions, and coping ability, were of specific interest and have not been well studied to date or applied as an osteoarthritis intervention guide that appears to address:

* Exposures to one or more actual or perceived chronic stressors such as an intractable personal or existential health threats.

* A possible limited ability to reduce or conceive reducing this threat.

* A series of negative beliefs about the self-and the situation.

* A limited ability to access ongoing social support.

* Ineffective or suboptimal coping strategies/style.

Likely moderators in this regard that were sought are age, resources, dispositions, culture, degree/duration of any impairment, degree of potential resilience and socioeconomics 2022.

It is well established that among the many health challenges that evolve over the course of time, osteoarthritis, the most common joint disease, causes appreciable pain and functional disability in a high percentage of people over 55 years of age. Principally due to symptomatic pathological changes in the cartilage tissue lining the surfaces of one or more freely moving joints such as the hip and knee joints, osteoarthritis can be extremely debilitating, especially if accompanied by multiple chronic medical conditions, including depression.

However, although depression occurs with a high prevalence especially in the older population, many of whom may suffer from painful disabling osteoarthritis, there has been very little specific emphasis placed on the importance of evaluating and treating depression in the cycle of disability in adults with osteoarthritis. Indeed, until recently, evidence has been very sparse in examining depression in the context of osteoarthritis carefully and conclusively. The joints studied and their degree of pathology, plus the modes of assessing both osteoarthritis severity, as well as depressive symptoms is also highly non uniform and fragmented. Thus what is reported may depend on what was measured and by the type of prevailing tool applied and sample studied. With very few prospective analyses, even when assessed empirically, whether it is important to minimize depressive symptoms in older adults with osteoarthritis and if so in what regard, has been unclear at best to date.

Based on the fact that persistent depression, a major health issue impacting older adults negatively may already exist, and may remain extremely challenging to eliminate for those who are in pain and trying to cope with osteoarthritis, this mini review strove to examine what is published in this regard in 2023. The aim was to pinpoint if ongoing health services and research are yet needed for advancing much needed efforts towards alleviating the burden currently experienced by many older adults and their families and caregivers as far as osteoarthritis is concerned, and in what regard, or whether robust inroads in these demanding health challenges have indeed been made or might benefit from certain principles put forth in the Transactional Model of Coping20. Specifically sought were facts concerning depression or feelings thereof in any form of osteoarthritis, regardless of data source, such as reviews.

Taken as a whole, and even if studies to the contrary are ‘in press’ or have not been published for various reasons, and are not listed in the current data bases applied, it appears that in contrast to numbers of surgical and medically oriented articles, the topic of osteoarthritis and depression remains very poorly researched. Moreover, what is published fails to address multiple methodological flaws highlighted in prior reports. As well, depression when mentioned is commonly not the primary study focus, but a secondary disease feature at best. It is hence not possible to definitively establish the pathway or pathways that are consistently implicated in osteoarthritis associated depression symptoms, nor how these can be moderated, if possible. For example, Paun 54 assert that even when taken on its own, the prevalence of late-life depression that can predictably increase osteoarthritis suffering and disability is often assumed to be part of the normal aging process. There is also a pervasive lack of distinct diagnostic criteria specific to older adults to affirm whether depression is reactive or a trait feature of osteoarthritis that too may be undiagnosed and untreated and accepted as an inevitable age associated declining condition that cannot be impacted favorably, leading to high narcotic use, mood changes, low life quality, and a high rate of premature death or suicide.

Because of its complex etiologies, especially in older adults with other health issues careful timely and ongoing assessments, with valid measures especially in older adults with disabling osteoarthritis appear indicated. As such, it also seems feasible to suggest clinicians aiming at reducing the immense osteoarthritis burden and its depression associations will find efforts to evaluate and treat this set of conditions using the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping as one explanatory and guiding framework highly beneficial in multiple spheres at all disease stages. Harris et al. 55 for example show that coping with life stress involves both attitudinal coping processes developed early in life such as stoicism, plus transient cognitive and support-based responses that may indeed have a bearing on how osteoarthritis is appraised and dealt with. Women in their study also described a dualistic process involving a reduction in their ability to cope with ongoing stress over time, coupled with personal growth that can conceivably impact osteoarthritis outcomes and cognitions of. non-arthritis situations. Hermson et al. 46 support the role of fostering self-efficacy in this regard.

However, failing that, it appears health outcomes may prove less than desirable as far as influencing:

a. Adherence to treatment recommendations

b. The degree of prevailing/future disability

c. Fatigue

d. Loneliness/social isolation 56

e. Overmedication/narcotic addiction

f. Poor coping efficacy 56

g. Resilience

h. Self esteem/efficacy declines

i. Stigma

j. Stress management challenges 5758

As such, even if above factors are not all inclusive, it is clear many significant health determinants may emerge and converge to influence successful results of osteoarthritis management, but this may also depend on the ability to pinpoint who is at risk for cognitive declines early on, as well as by efforts to examine the attributes deemed noteworthy over time in efforts to successfully reduce stress in general, including but not limited to social, economic, and physical stress. 

To this end, it appears reasonable to conclude that more careful selection criteria in future well designed studies are essential for examining osteoarthritis as well as any depression correlates among older adults, and with carefully defined subgroups of sufficient cases who are followed over time, rather than heterogeneous samples observed in retrospect 59.

As per Patten et al. 37 a strong link between pain and depression in patients awaiting specialist orthopedic consultation exists, thus indicating a need for an early integrated approach in addressing pain management and depression to optimally treat this complex health condition.

In the interim, it is not possible to derive any cumulative sense of direction on any aspect this current topic given the numerous sampling issues, and diverse measures employed-to discern depressive features as well as pain, alongside multiple problems related to study design. In addition, it can be argued that a failure to examine the possible role of stress, coping and control beliefs, self efficacy attributes, social circumstances, fatigue, sleep issues, fear, disability, and pain extent, and others such as body mass and heart health status uniformly and collectively-can lead to erroneous rather than robust conclusions. To overcome one or more of these shortcomings, objective data to support subjective findings are sorely needed, because symptoms of depression and pain in particular may be linked directly or indirectly to the subject’s interpretation of their condition, their beliefs about their situation, their social circumstances or nature of any social network inputs and others, rather than changes in joint biology. They may be negatively influenced by prevailing myths, and social or cultural norms or their providers view points as well and not referred for treatment. They may also feel unconfident as a result of what they believe and perceive if they cannot take action and make sound decisions or feel their actions may prove futile. Others may feel efficacious, but are depressed because they may have limited health services access and social resources to draw on.

It is possible that subject to further study, it may be possible to develop a sense of the various sequential and signaling pathways that underpin osteoarthritis and depression and that embrace issues related to primary appraisal of the patient’s condition^s, such as the perceived disease and disability threat, how controllable this stressor is, and the magnitude of their perceived coping ability. It may then be possible to foster adaptive versus negative or maladaptive coping approaches, as well as spirituality or positive outlook based coping strategies 62.

Approaches to advance this might include-

1. Offering the patient a broad array of relevant resources and helping them manage uncertainty and control stress.

2. Sharing with them the need to prevent excess joint stress, as well as mental stress.

3. Helping them to manage any prevailing comorbid condition.

4. Fostering family and other social support perceptions 63.

5. Strengthening the patient’s ability to improve their lives and control stress.

6. Applying positive psychology approaches ^{gratitude self} alongside efforts to foster empowerment 6164.

7. Providing for personalized ongoing management approaches.

8. Preventing addictions and medical interventions associated with depression and educating about osteoarthritis and benefits of natural anti depressives 65 as well as risks of surgery, injections, opioids is advocated as well

In short, helping older clients in distress or at risk for this negative health correlate to feel understood and cared for through careful pain assessments, efforts to listen attentively alongside those designed to boost their general as well as action specific self-efficacy beliefs are likely to prove beneficial 6366. Stressing the value of exercise as indicated 67, alongside integrated evaluations and interventions 68, and providing for socially supportive resources, and screening opportunities is also strongly indicated 231.

It appears that several realms of inquiry will be insightful in advancing our understandings, In this regard, how osteoarthritis biological features are impacted by cognitive appraisals warrants attention. Efforts to examine whether coping ability or its analog of poor coping skills impact physical function, as well as inflammation and age associated muscle mass losses as observed in osteoarthritis and if so- in what way can be equally advantageous. Moreover, can osteoarthritis be seen and viewed as a chronic stressor that may perpetuate its progression if cognition of fear, self efficacy, and beliefs based on misinformation or aging myths and others prevail?

Indeed, even if it hoped that a machine learning algorithm can be duly developed to identify potential surgical candidates for joint replacement surgery in end-stage osteoarthritis cases without an in-person evaluation or physical examination, can this system be internally or externally validated if patients personal needs, voices and holistic rather than standard radiographic evaluations are obviated and exclude the weight of depressive factors is the course of predicting need and health recovery potential 69. This in our view is clearly an immense albeit artificial barrier to the future of many osteoarthritis cases who might be helped conservatively. In particular, because osteoarthritis pain, the problem of most concern to patients, is deemed a subjective and personal experience that cannot be accurately understood by any aggregated mathematical set of equations with any degree of accuracy the true nature of the individual’s disease experience and manifestations and potential for recovery cannot be readily assumed. In addition, there is no global standard for the assessment of any osteoarthritis cognitive factor at present and how to mitigate or avert these 70. Surgery alone, while largely beneficial, may fail to achieve the desired result as well 7172.  

Key possible explanatory factors to examine are: Perceptions and Relevance of Osteoarthritis to the individual’s wellbeing along with their Resources.

While limited, the present overview leads us to conclude:

· High quality research into the nature of any potential or actual depressive responses and why these occur in some osteoarthritis cases and not others is limited at best but could be beneficial and lead to better outcomes and cost savings.

· To address the diverse and often times purely subjective data collection processes in this realm, efforts to standardize and supplement tentative diagnoses via clinical verification and controls are sorely needed to avert erroneous diagnoses.

· For therapeutic purposes caution is advised because who will benefit, what is best for them, and why and in what respect or dosage is unclear.

· An accepted explanatory and predictive framework such as the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping may well advance this realm of research and practice in multiple ways.

· Alternately, a failure to collect a wide array of validated and longitudinally captured data across diverse samples and that examine those variables that impact stress specifically will likely fail to enhance understandings and provide direction into methods to counter this growing burdensome mental and physical health epidemic among older adults wherever they reside.

Until more data are forthcoming an effective stress management program may be helpful in light of the interactive determinants of osteoarthritis management such as its socioeconomic factors, such as racism, and being stigmatized that are chronic stressors in their own right.