<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JAPB</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of Advances in Plant Biology</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2638-4469</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JAPB-22-4102</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2638-4469.japb-22-4102</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Dose Response of Total Saponins Isolated from the Stem Bark of Dialium Guineense</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>O.D.,</surname>
            <given-names>Abu</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842874548">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842875988">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>I.O.,</surname>
            <given-names>Onoagbe</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842874548">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>I.,</surname>
            <given-names>Ojo</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842876276">2</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1842874548">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.  </addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842876276">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Chemistry, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, USA.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842875988">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <name>
            <surname>Zhongzhou</surname>
            <given-names>Chen</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842989276">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1842989276">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>China agricultural university.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
    
    O.D., Abu, <addr-line>Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, Benin </addr-line><addr-line>City,   </addr-line><addr-line>        Nigeria.</addr-line><email>osahon.abu@uniben.edu</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1843376612">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2022-03-21">
        <day>21</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2022</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>6</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>11</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>03</month>
          <year>2022</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>O.D., Abu, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/japb/article/1788">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/japb/article/1788</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>The safety of plant-derived bioactive  compounds has become a global concern. The              present study investigated the dose response of total saponins isolated from the stem bark of       <italic>Dialium</italic><italic>guineense</italic><italic>. </italic>Adultmale Wistar rats (n = 15) weighing 170 – 190 g (mean weight = 180 ± 10 g) were randomly assigned to three groups (5 rats per group). The rats received varied doses of total saponins isolated from the stem bark of the           medicinal plant (50 - 150 mg/kg body weight, bwt) orally for a period of 9 days. The concentration of fasting blood glucose (FBG) was used as the            therapeutic index.The results of the analysis revealed that total saponins isolated from the stem bark of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic> significantly reduced the Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) levels of normal Wistar rats (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). The graded and quantal dose-response curves showed that150 mg/kg bwt was effective in reducing the blood glucose of rats (produced the best                       hypoglycemic effect). The study concluded that total saponins isolated from the stem bark of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic> possesses hypoglycemic effect at a relatively good dose.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Fasting blood glucose</kwd>
        <kwd>Hypoglycemic effect</kwd>
        <kwd>Medicinal plant</kwd>
        <kwd>Quantal dose-response</kwd>
        <kwd>Wistar rat.</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="2"/>
        <table-count count="3"/>
        <page-count count="6"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1842718308" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>In recent times, plant-derived substances have become of huge importance to man due to their many applications. Extraction methods involve the separation of medicinally active portions of plant  tissues from the inactive/inert components using selective solvents. These plant components exist as complex mixtures of many medicinal metabolites, such as alkaloids, glycosides, terpenoids, phenols, flavonoids, and lignans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842773308">1</xref>. Medicinal plants have long been recognized as important sources of           therapeutically active compounds. Evidence-based                research supports the medical and pharmacological                benefits of plant-derived compounds with interest in the identification and characterization of bioactive                       compounds from natural sources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842838252">2</xref>. There have been growing interests in the toxicity of substances purified from plants basically to determine their safety <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842852148">3</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842622380">4</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842629292">5</xref>. </p>
      <p>Saponins are low molecular weight secondary plant metabolites containing either a tetracyclic steroidal or a pentacyclic triterpenoid aglycone with one or more sugar chains <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842626628">6</xref>. They are a class of chemical compounds found in abundance in various plants species. Saponins are amphipathic glycosides grouped phenomenologically by the soap-like foam. They are produced in aqueous               solutions when shaken, and structurally by having one or more hydrophilic glycoside moieties combined with a   lipophilic triterpene or steroid derivative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842619484">7</xref>. Saponins are categorized according to the number of sugar chains in their structures as mono, di-, or tridesmosidic saponins. The most common monosaccharides in saponins include D-glucose, D-galactose, D-glucuronic acid, D-galacturonic acid, L-rhamnose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, and D-fructose <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842617468">8</xref>. This study aimed to carry out a dose response study of total saponins isolated from <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic>stem bark. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842718884" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <p>Adult male Wistar rats (n = 15) weighing                    170 – 190 g (mean weight = 180 ± 10 g) were obtained from the Department of Anatomy, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. The rats were housed in metal cages under standard laboratory conditions: temperature of            25 <sup>°</sup>C, 55 – 65 % humidity and 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. They were allowed free access to rat feed (pelletized growers mash) and clean drinking water. Before the             commencement of the study, the rats were acclimatized to the laboratory environment for one week. The study               protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use of the Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria.</p>
      <p>The stem barks of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic> were obtained from the Auchi Area of Edo State, Nigeria and                           authenticated at the herbarium of the Department of Plant Biology and Biotechnology, University of Benin, Benin City, Nigeria. </p>
      <p>The stem bark was brushed and shade-dried at  30 °C for two weeks and crushed into small pieces using clean mortar and pestle. Total saponins were isolated from the stem bark using the standard method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842613580">9</xref>. </p>
      <p>The rats were randomly assigned to three groups (5 rats per group). They received varying doses of isolated total saponins (50 - 150 mg/kg bwt) orally for 9 days. The concentration of FBG was used as the therapeutic index.  </p>
      <p>Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5).                Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (20.0). Groups were compared with Duncan multiple range test. Values of<italic> p</italic> &lt; 0.05 were considered statistically significant. </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842690452" sec-type="results">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>Total saponins isolated from the stem bark of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic> significantly reduced the FBG levels of normal Wistar rats (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). The graded and quantal                       dose-response curves showed that150 mg/kg bwt was effective in reducing the blood glucose of rats (produced the best hypoglycemic effect) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850520676">Table 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850499580">Table 2</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850452548">Table 3</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850420500">Figure 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850419348">Figure 2</xref></p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850520676">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Concentrations of Fasting Blood Glucose of Rats Treated with Isolated Total               Saponins of D. guineense Stem Bark </title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Dose (mg/kg </bold>
                <bold>bwt</bold>
                <bold>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="5">Blood Glucose Concentration (mg/dL)</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold> </bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold> Basal</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 3</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 5</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 7</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 9</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>50</td>
              <td>72.50 ± 0.50</td>
              <td>59.50 ± 1.50</td>
              <td>66.50 ± 3.50</td>
              <td>50.00 ± 3.00</td>
              <td>51.50 ± 5.50</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>100</td>
              <td>102.50 ± 2.50</td>
              <td>83.00 ± 4.00</td>
              <td>87.50 ± 5.50</td>
              <td>74.50 ± 4.50</td>
              <td>76.00 ± 4.00</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>150</td>
              <td>96.00 ± 5.00</td>
              <td>89.00 ± 4.00</td>
              <td>76.00 ± 5.00</td>
              <td>45.50 ± 4.50</td>
              <td>61.00 ± 4.00 </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850499580">
        <label>Table 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Glycemic Change of Rats Treated with Total Saponins of D. guineense   Stem Bark</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Dose (mg/kg </bold>
                <bold>bwt</bold>
                <bold>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="4">Blood glucose reduction (mg/dL)  </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold> </bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 3</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 5</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 7</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 9</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>50</td>
              <td>13.00 ± 2.00          </td>
              <td>6.00 ± 1.00            </td>
              <td>22.50 ± 3.50          </td>
              <td>21.00 ± 4.00     </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>100</td>
              <td>19.50 ± 1.50         </td>
              <td>15.00 ± 3.00           </td>
              <td>28.00 ± 4.00           </td>
              <td>26.50 ± 2.50    </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>150</td>
              <td>7.00 ± 1.00           </td>
              <td>20.00 ± 3.00           </td>
              <td>28.00 ± 4.00           </td>
              <td>35.00 ± 3.00   </td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850452548">
        <label>Table 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Percentage Glycemic Change of Rats Treated with Total Saponins of D. guineense Stem Bark   </title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>
                <bold>Dose(</bold>
                <bold>mg/kg </bold>
                <bold>bwt</bold>
                <bold>)</bold>
              </td>
              <td colspan="4">Blood glucose reduction (mg/dL)  </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th>
                <bold> </bold>
              </th>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 3</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 5</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 7</bold>
              </td>
              <td>
                <bold>Day 9</bold>
              </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>50</td>
              <td>17.93 ± 3.19         </td>
              <td>8.28 ± 0.55           </td>
              <td>31.03 ± 1.94        </td>
              <td>28.97 ± 2.06  </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>100</td>
              <td>19.02 ± 3.94         </td>
              <td>8.28 ± 0.55           </td>
              <td>27.32 ± 2.95        </td>
              <td>25.85 ± 2.49 </td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>150</td>
              <td>7.29 ± 0.52          </td>
              <td>20.83 ± 2.90         </td>
              <td>52.60 ± 5.11        </td>
              <td>36.46 ± 3.62</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <fig id="idm1850420500">
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Graded Doses Response Curve for Isolated Total Saponins </title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image1.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="idm1850419348">
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Quantal Dose Response Curve for Isolated Total Saponins </title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image2.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842640460" sec-type="discussion">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The graded dose-response relationship is a            fundamental aspect of Pharmacology. It is employed to study the effects of increasing drug dose and its response in a system. For instance, individual fibres of the skeletal muscle are capable of eliciting progressively increasing responses with increasing doses of a particular drug. The corresponding increase in response can be measured. With the increase in the response of dose, at first, there is a considerable increase in response and then, there are smaller increments as the dose approaches the maximum limit. After the maximum response has been reached, no further increase in response can be obtained with a              further increase in dose. Generally, the dose-response curve assumes a shape or sigmoid pattern, and as a rule, the relationship between the dose and response is linear and well pronounced in the main body of the curve. This part of the curve (between 25 and 75 % of the curve) is important in analytical and practical Pharmacology. Boundaries of the linearity can be extended utilizing            certain mathematical transformations of other doses or responses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842609332">10</xref>. </p>
      <p>It is critical when performing dose-response    analyses to have a clear concept of what type of “dose” to use. Three basic types of “dose” arise from scientific             investigations: (1) the administered or external dose;            (2) the internal (absorbed) dose; and (3) the target or  tissue dose. These doses are interrelated, and each of them can be used to express dose-response relationships <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842609332">10</xref>. </p>
      <p>External dose refers to the amount of an agent or chemical administered to an experimental animal or          human in a controlled experimental setting by some           specific route at some specific frequency. The external dose is often referred to as exposure or intake. It is             frequently the dose metric that is used in observational epidemiological studies. Internal dose is the amount that is systemically available and can be regarded as the              fraction of the external dose that is absorbed and enters the general circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842602996">11</xref>.   </p>
      <p>It is a consequence of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of the chemical and can be            derived from suitable toxicokinetic mass balance studies. The analytical method used in the toxicokinetic studies determines whether the “dose” refers to the parent          compound alone or the parent compound plus first-pass metabolites. Biomarkers of internal doses, such as plasma concentrations or urinary excretion, are sometimes              available in epidemiological studies. The tissue dose is the amount that is distributed to and present in a specific         tissue of interest. Two parameters are important               determinants of dose: the dose frequency and duration of dosing. Dosing can be acute, sub-chronic or chronic. </p>
      <p>The description of dose reflects the magnitude, frequency and duration over which it applies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842590652">12</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842586044">13</xref>.     Response, in this context, generally relates to an                      observation or effect seen following exposure <italic>in vivo</italic> or <italic>in vitro</italic>. Possible end-points cover a broad range of                 observations, from early responses such as biochemical alterations to more complicated responses such as cancer and developmental defects. Responses can be either                    adaptive or adverse. Adverse effects are defined as a change in the morphology, physiology, growth,                    development, reproduction or life span of an organism or subsystem (subpopulation of cells) that results in an           impairment of functional capacity, an impairment of the capacity to compensate for additional stress or an increase in susceptibility to other influences <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842585828">14</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842582516">15</xref>. </p>
      <p>Most responses of interest in the context of            dose-response assessment fall into one of four basic            categories: quantal responses, counts, continuous measures and ordinal categorical measures. Quantal             responses relate to an effect that is either observed or not observed in each subject (laboratory animal or human). For each dose, the number of subjects responding out of the number of subjects available is reported (for example, the proportion of animals with a tumour in a cancer           bioassay) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842602996">11</xref><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1842590652">12</xref>. The results of this study showed that total saponins isolated from the stem bark of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic> significantly reduced the FBG levels of normal Wistar rats. The graded and quantal dose-response curves showed that150 mg/kg bwt was effective in reducing the blood glucose of rats.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842653852" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>The results of this study suggest that total               saponins isolated from the stem bark of <italic>D. </italic><italic>guineense</italic>             possess a hypoglycemic effect at a relatively good dose.   </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1842773308">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Handa</surname>
            <given-names>S S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>P Khanuja</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Longo</surname>
            <given-names>G</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Rakesh</surname>
            <given-names>D D</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Extraction technologies for medicinal and aromatic plants. International center for science and high technology</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2008</year>
          </date>
          <volume>1</volume>
          <fpage>266</fpage>
          <publisher-loc>Trieste, Italy</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842838252">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Sandoval</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Okuhama</surname>
            <given-names>N N</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>X</surname>
            <given-names>J Zhang</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>L</surname>
            <given-names>A Condezo</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lao</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Anti-inflammation and antioxidant activities of cat’s claw (Uncaria tomentos and Uncaria guianensis) are independent of their alkaloid content</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>Phytomedicine</source>
          <volume>9</volume>
          <fpage>325</fpage>
          <lpage>337</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842852148">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>O</surname>
            <given-names>D Abu</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>K</surname>
            <given-names>E Imafidon</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>E Iribhogbe</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Biochemical effect of aqueous leaf extract of Icacina trichanta Oliv. on urea, creatinine and kidney oxidative status in CCl4-induced Wistar rats</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2015</year>
          </date>
          <source>Nigerian Journal of Life Sciences</source>
          <volume>5</volume>
          <issue>1</issue>
          <fpage>85</fpage>
          <lpage>89</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842622380">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>O</surname>
            <given-names>D Abu</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>I</surname>
            <given-names>O Onoagbe</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Acute toxicity of aqueous and ethanol extracts ofDialiumguineensestem bark.Journal of</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2021</year>
          </date>
          <volume>10</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>427</fpage>
          <lpage>432</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842629292">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>O</surname>
            <given-names>D Abu</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>E</surname>
            <given-names>F Adeogun</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>S</surname>
            <given-names>O Ebhohon</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Oral LD50 of total saponins and tannins isolated from Dialiumguineensestem bark.European</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2019</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Experimental Biology.9</source>
          <volume>2</volume>
          <fpage>11</fpage>
          <lpage>13</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842626628">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>P Vincken</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Heng</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>D Groot</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Gruppen</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Saponins, classification and occurrence in the plant kingdom.Phytochemistry</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2007</year>
          </date>
          <volume>68</volume>
          <fpage>275</fpage>
          <lpage>297</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842619484">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Kar</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Pharmacognosy and Pharmaco-biotechnology, 2nd Edition</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2007</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>332</fpage>
          <lpage>600</lpage>
          <publisher-name>New Age International Limited Publishers</publisher-name>
          <publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842617468">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Pelah</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Abramovich</surname>
            <given-names>Z</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Markus</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Wiesman</surname>
            <given-names>Z</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>The use of commercial saponin from Quillaja saponaria bark as a natural larvicidal agent against Aedes aegypti and Culex pipiens</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2002</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Ethnopharmacology</source>
          <volume>81</volume>
          <fpage>407</fpage>
          <lpage>409</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842613580">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Hostettemann</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Marston</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Saponins: chemistry and pharmacology of natural product. Cambridge University press.Cambridge</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2005</year>
          </date>
          <fpage>155</fpage>
          <lpage>167</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842609332">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book">
          <name>
            <surname>Cassette</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>D Kaasen</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>O Amur</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Dolls</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Principles of Toxicology In:</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1996</year>
          </date>
          <chapter-title>Cassarett and Doul’s Pharmacology, The Basic Science of Poison Edited by Curtis, D. Klaassen, 5th edition copyright McGraw – Hill (USA) Health Professional Division</chapter-title>
          <fpage>403</fpage>
          <lpage>414</lpage>
          <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842602996">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>D</surname>
            <given-names>G Barnes</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>G</surname>
            <given-names>P Daston</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>J</surname>
            <given-names>S Evans</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>A</surname>
            <given-names>M Jarabek</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>R</surname>
            <given-names>J Kavlock</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>A Kimmel</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>H</surname>
            <given-names>L Spitzer</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Benchmark dose workshop: criteria for use of a benchmark dose to estimate a reference dose.Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1995</year>
          </date>
          <volume>21</volume>
          <fpage>296</fpage>
          <lpage>306</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842590652">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>C</surname>
            <given-names>A Kimmel</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>D</surname>
            <given-names>W Gaylor</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Issues in qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for development toxicology.Risk Analysis</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1988</year>
          </date>
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          <lpage>20</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842586044">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Slob</surname>
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>M</surname>
            <given-names>N Pieters</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: general framework.Risk Analysis</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <volume>18</volume>
          <fpage>787</fpage>
          <lpage>798</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842585828">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="book"><article-title>World Health Organization (2006). Evaluation of certain food</article-title><chapter-title>contaminants.1 Sixty-fourth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO</chapter-title>
Technical Report Series No. 930



</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1842582516">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal"><article-title>World Health Organization. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants.Sixty-eighth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva, World Health Organization (WHO</article-title><date><year>2007</year></date>
Technical Report Series No. 947



</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
