<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf8"?>
 <!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"> <article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JNDC</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Journal of New Developments in Chemistry</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2377-2549</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Open Access Pub</publisher-name>
        <publisher-loc>United States</publisher-loc>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JNDC-21-3740</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14302/issn.2377-2549.jndc-21-3740</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group>
          <subject>research-article</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Characterization of Ground Water Quality in Southern and Northern Region of Zanzibar Island</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Abdul</surname>
            <given-names>AJM</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842213300">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842231060">*</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Lim</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842214380">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name>
            <surname>Miza</surname>
            <given-names>AK</given-names>
          </name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="idm1842213300">1</xref>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="idm1842213300">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line>Department of Natural Science, School of Natural and Social Sciences, The State University of Zanzibar. P. O. Box 146, Zanzibar-Tanzania.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842214380">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line>Faculty of Science (FOS), Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Jalan Tungku, Bandar Seri Begawan, BE 1410 Brunei Darussalam.</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <aff id="idm1842231060">
        <label>*</label>
        <addr-line>Corresponding author</addr-line>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <corresp>
    
    Abdul A. J. Mohamed, <addr-line>Department of Natural Science, School of Natural and         Social  Sciences, The State University of Zanzibar. P. O. Box 146, Zanzibar-Tanzania</addr-line> , <email>jumabdull@yahoo.com</email></corresp>
        <fn fn-type="conflict" id="idm1842459772">
          <p>The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub" iso-8601-date="2021-06-28">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>3</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>22</fpage>
      <lpage>31</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>10</day>
          <month>02</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>21</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="online">
          <day>28</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2021</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
        <copyright-holder>Abdul AJM, et al.</copyright-holder>
        <license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri xlink:href="http://openaccesspub.org/jndc/article/1654">This article is available from http://openaccesspub.org/jndc/article/1654</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>Millions of people from different countries depend on groundwater, which might contain elevated levels of unhygienic constituents. Poor quality of drinking water in many countries has been forcing people to use bottled water. In the present study, groundwater samples were collected in November 2014 leading to        twenty-nine analysis of groundwater samples. The primary objective of this paper is to study the selected groundwater quality parameters as an establishment of preliminary baselines on groundwater constituents. A total of twenty nine water samples were collected (fourteen and fifteen samples from North and South regions of Zanzibar Island respectively. Physical parameters (Turbidity, oxidation-reduction potential ORP, Eh, pH, total dissolved soild TDS, salinity, and Electrical conductivity (EC) were determined in situ using Horiba                multiparameters digital meters. Analysis of anions (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>, Br<sup>-</sup> , SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2-</sup>, F<sup>-</sup>, NO<sub>2</sub><sup>-</sup>) was carried out using Ion chromatography (IC). Nitrite and nitrate for some water were below detection limit (BDL) The order of relative abundance for anions in samples collected at Northern region of Zanzibar Island, was NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>&gt; Br<sup>- </sup>&gt; SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2- </sup>&gt; F<sup>- </sup>&gt; NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>, while for the Southern region the order was NO<sub>3</sub><sup>- </sup>&gt;Br<sup>- </sup>&gt; NO<sub>2</sub><sup>- </sup>&gt; SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2- </sup>&gt; F<sup>- </sup>. In both regions, the orders for other parameters were; Turbidity &gt; pH &gt; salinity; and EC &gt;TDS &gt; ORP &gt; Eh. Almost all the measured parameters were within the WHO guidelines for drinking water. However, for nitrate and bromide, the percentage that exceeded the WHO limit was 7%, and 10.3% respectively. Based on toxicological perspective, although few samples had concentrations above groundwater quality criterion it is fundamental to estimate the intake by humans through the drinking water pathways.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Drinking water</kwd>
        <kwd>nitrate</kwd>
        <kwd>bromide</kwd>
        <kwd>toxicological perspective</kwd>
        <kwd>Ion chromatography</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <counts>
        <fig-count count="15"/>
        <table-count count="2"/>
        <page-count count="10"/>
      </counts>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="idm1842078660" sec-type="intro">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Water is the most essential liquid for maintaining life on the earth and its sustenance. According to Miller (1997) about 97% water exists in oceans that is not potable, and only 3% is fresh water (2.97% is comprised by glaciers and ice caps, and 0.3% is available as a surface and ground water). Safe drinking water is a fundamental need for good health; it is also a basic human right. In many parts of the world, fresh water is already an inadequate resource. </p>
      <p>In the next century, it is anticipitated to be even more limiting due to factors such as increased population, urbanization and other environmental degradations. Nevertheless, there is a general belief that groundwater is purer and safer than the surface water due to the protective qualities of the soil cover. On the other hand, groundwater can be considered as a renewable resource depending on its usage and consumption. </p>
      <p>Furthermore, there is a general knowledge gap regarding which chemicals are present in various products related to motorized transports, detergents, building constructions materials including paints cements etc, solid and liquid wastes such as obsolete electronic devices, and how big is their amounts. Thus, current knowledge about the spread of these chemicals in to the environment is also insufficient. This creates a kind of motivation for in-depth investigation about toxicants entering different ecosystems.</p>
      <p>Announced that the groundwater is never chemically pure, as at any given time, it is invariably exposed to some of the minerals, which in turn results into minerals dissolution. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1849719980">1</xref></p>
      <p>Generally, groundwater quality refers to its chemical, physical, biological, and isotopic characteristics. Usually, the quality of groundwater is controlled by several factors including rock types, climate, and human activities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1849722140">2</xref><bold>. </bold>As the groundwater is polluted anthropogenically, groundwater pollution becomes a serious global problem. Thus the analysis of the water quality is very important to preserve and protect the natural eco system.</p>
      <p>The biological and physico-chemical composition of groundwater varies depending upon several factors for instances; contact time of recharge water with the surrounding soil or rock material, frequency of precipitation (which will leach out different materials) and duration of rainwater in the soil before reaching the respective aquifers. Nevertheless, anthropogenic release of pollutants to the ground is a potential source of groundwater contamination. This is because; pollutants released on to the ground, most probably find their way down to the soil profiles into the groundwater aquifers. </p>
      <p>Groundwater contamination is very common in water sources located within unplanned settlements characterized with dense population and poor or no sanitation facilities. Consequently, as recharge water moves down the soil profile, it picks up a wide range of chemical species, such as magnesium, calcium, and chlorides. This process deteriorates the quality of the recharged water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1849731508">3</xref>.</p>
      <p>Groundwater quality determines its suitability for different purposes such as, domestic, drinking, agricultural, and even industrial purposes. Thereby, the knowledge on the groundwater quality as well as its quantity is very important. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1849826612">4</xref></p>
      <p>Accordingly, this study aimed at characterizing ground water quality in Southern and Northern region of Zanzibar Island based selected physico-chemical parameters (Turbidity, Eh, ORP, pH, EC, TDS, sulphate, bromide, nitrate, nitrite, and fluoride) so as to find out the perception applicability of a general belief that groundwater (due to the protective qualities of the soil cover) is always pure and safer source of water.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ridm1849574644">5</xref></p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842052884" sec-type="materials">
      <title>Material and Method</title>
      <p>Twenty-nine community water sources (dug wells and bore wells) were investigated during an initial field survey and laboratory analysis, some wells were specifically chosen to find some association of the measured parameters with the location of wells. The groundwater samples were collected in November 2014 leading to twenty-nine sets of groundwater sampling and analysis. The groundwater samples were collected based on standard procedures in 500 mL capacity bottles. The positions of the wells were marked using Global Positioning System (GPS) as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850378700a">figure 1</xref>. Before the sampling, all bottles were soaked with diluted nitric acid solution, washed with distilled water, and again prior to each sampling, each bottle was washed with the water to be sampled. In the case of bore wells, the water samples were collected after pumping the water for sufficient time to collect the formation water. The collected samples were then transported and stored in laboratory for analysis. Handling of the samples at different stages was in accordance with the protocol given in the standard EPA method 200.7.</p>
      <fig id="idm1850378700a">
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Sampling station in North and South regions of Zanzibar Island</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image1.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <p>Prior to anions analysis, all samples were filtered using 0.45 µm Millipore filter paper. Concentrations of bromide, sulfate, nitrate, nitrite, and fluoride, in the groundwater samples were analyzed using an Ion Chromatograph (IC Metrohm 883 with column type Metrosep A Supp 5 - 150/4.0) along with appropriate standards. Calibration chromatogram for the seven analyzed parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850589748">figure 2</xref>), and chromatogram for nitrite and fluoride (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850588812">figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850588236">figure 4</xref>) all are well presented in this paper. </p>
      <fig id="idm1850589748">
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Calibration chromatogram for seven analyzed anions</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image2.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="idm1850588812">
        <label>Figure 3.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Calibration curves for Nitrite</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image3.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
      <fig id="idm1850588236">
        <label>Figure 4.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Calibration curves for Fluoride</title>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="images/image4.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
      </fig>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1842057924" sec-type="results">
      <title>Result and discussion </title>
      <p>The general summary for the descriptive statistics of the twenty-nine analyzed water samples is depicted on <xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850592340">table 1</xref>. </p>
      <table-wrap id="idm1850592340">
        <label>Table 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <title> Descriptive Statistics</title>
        </caption>
        <table rules="all" frame="box">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <td>Parameters</td>
              <td>N</td>
              <td>Minimum</td>
              <td>Maximum</td>
              <td>Mean</td>
              <td>Std. Deviation</td>
              <td>Variance</td>
              <td>WHO</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Turbidity (NTU)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.0</td>
              <td>19.0</td>
              <td>3.53</td>
              <td>4.63</td>
              <td>21.48</td>
              <td>5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Eh (mV)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>-79</td>
              <td>16</td>
              <td>-23.48</td>
              <td>21.35</td>
              <td>455.83</td>
              <td>NA</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>pH</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>7</td>
              <td>8</td>
              <td>7.24</td>
              <td>0.36</td>
              <td>0.129</td>
              <td>6.5-8.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>ORP(mV)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>93</td>
              <td>319</td>
              <td>250.31</td>
              <td>52.11</td>
              <td>2.715E3</td>
              <td>NA</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>EC (µS/cm)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>190</td>
              <td>7150</td>
              <td>900.31</td>
              <td>1392.12</td>
              <td>1.938E6</td>
              <td>1000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>TDS (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>123</td>
              <td>4510</td>
              <td>567.52</td>
              <td>867.37</td>
              <td>7.523E5</td>
              <td>1000</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Sulfate (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.00</td>
              <td>5.205</td>
              <td>0.442</td>
              <td>1.23</td>
              <td>1.52</td>
              <td>250</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Bromide (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.026</td>
              <td>7.002</td>
              <td>0.644</td>
              <td>1.63</td>
              <td>2.66</td>
              <td>NA</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Nitrate (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.0</td>
              <td>144.174</td>
              <td>18.66</td>
              <td>30.16</td>
              <td>909.92</td>
              <td>50</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Fluoride (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.0</td>
              <td>0.544</td>
              <td>0.18</td>
              <td>0.11</td>
              <td>0.013</td>
              <td>1.5</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Nitrite (mg/L)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0</td>
              <td>3</td>
              <td>0.16</td>
              <td>0.615</td>
              <td>0.38</td>
              <td>3</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <td>Salinity (ppt)</td>
              <td>29</td>
              <td>0.1</td>
              <td>2.</td>
              <td>0.33</td>
              <td>0.36</td>
              <td>0.13</td>
              <td>NA</td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
      </table-wrap>
      <sec id="idm1842000988">
        <title>Sulfate </title>
        <p>The level of sulfate in the analyzed water samples within Northern region of Zanzibar Island ranged from BDL to 5.0205 mg/L, while in the Southern region of Zanzibar the range was from BDL to 1.709 mg/L. The average sulfate value was 0.442 mg/L. All water samples had the concentrations of sulfate, which were within an acceptable WHO limit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850485300">Figure 5</xref>). </p>
        <fig id="idm1850485300">
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Sulfate in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image5.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841999980">
        <title>Fluoride</title>
        <p>The level of fluoride in analyzed water samples within Northern region of Zanzibar Island ranged from BDL to 0.544 mg/L, while in the Southern region of Zanzibar the range was from BDL to 0.433 mg/L, with an average of 0.442 mg/L. All water samples had the concentration of fluoride within an acceptable WHO limit (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850486524">Figure 6</xref>). </p>
        <fig id="idm1850486524">
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Fluoride in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image6.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841977956">
        <title>Bromide</title>
        <p>The level of bromide in the analyzed water samples within Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island ranged from 0.026 mg/L to 7.002 mg/L, and 0.086 mg/L to 5.883 mg/L respectively, with an average of 0.644 mg/L (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850483644">Figure 7</xref>). Based on the acceptable daily intake of bromide (6 mg/L) as given by World Health Organization, some groundwater sources (Sites 4 and 20 of Northern and Southern region respectively) could be considered unsafe for human consumption. Nevertheless, based on the toxicity data from literature, and the groundwater quality criterion of 1 mg/L, only 10.3% (N=29) of the groundwater samples were above the limit. The sources of bromide in the region could be a result of natural as well as anthropogenic sources. </p>
        <fig id="idm1850483644">
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Bromide in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image7.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841978820">
        <title>Salinity and EC</title>
        <p>There was a remarkable correlation (r = 0.49) between salinity and EC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="idm1850481700">Table 2</xref>). Very strong correlation was observed between salinity and EC.</p>
        <table-wrap id="idm1850481700">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Correlation matrix for the analyzed parameters in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <table rules="all" frame="box">
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td> </td>
                <td>Sulphate</td>
                <td>Bromide</td>
                <td>Nitrate</td>
                <td>Fluoride</td>
                <td>Nitrite</td>
                <td>Salinity</td>
                <td>EC</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Sulphate (mg/L)</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>-0.05</td>
                <td>0.393</td>
                <td>0.022</td>
                <td>0.131</td>
                <td>-0.097</td>
                <td>0.018</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Bromide (mg/L)</td>
                <td>-0.05</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0.047</td>
                <td>0.225</td>
                <td>0.601</td>
                <td>-0.084</td>
                <td>0.956</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Nitrate (mg/L)</td>
                <td>0.393</td>
                <td>0.047</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>-0.272</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>-0.051</td>
                <td>0.112</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Fluoride (mg/L)</td>
                <td>0.022</td>
                <td>0.225</td>
                <td>-0.272</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>0.122</td>
                <td>-0.153</td>
                <td>0.277</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Nitrite (mg/L)</td>
                <td>-0.097</td>
                <td>-0.084</td>
                <td>-0.051</td>
                <td>-0.153</td>
                <td>-0.17</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>-0.124</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>Salinity(ppt)</td>
                <td>0.131</td>
                <td>0.601</td>
                <td>0.15</td>
                <td>0.122</td>
                <td>1</td>
                <td>-0.17</td>
                <td>0.49</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td>EC</td>
                <td>0.018</td>
                <td>0.956</td>
                <td>0.112</td>
                <td>0.277</td>
                <td>0.49</td>
                <td>-0.124</td>
                <td>1</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841957516">
        <title>Nitrate</title>
        <p>For samples collected from Northern and Southern regions of Zanzibar Island, the minimum and maximum nitrate levels (in mg/L)  are given in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850383308">Figure 8</xref>. In overall, the concentration of nitrate in groundwater from these regions varied from below detection limit (BDL) to 144.174 mg/L. Average value of nitrate was 18.66 mg/L. Health and Welfare World Guidelines had established a limit of 45 mg NO<sub>3</sub><sup>-</sup>/ L (WHO-2004). Thus, the percentage of groundwater samples exceeding this limit is about 7% (N=29). It noteworthy to point out that the exceeded levels of nitrate both came from water samples (site 10 and 11) of North region of Zanzibar Island.</p>
        <fig id="idm1850383308">
          <label>Figure 8.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Nitrate in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image8.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841959388">
        <title>Nitrite</title>
        <p>The level of nitrite in the analyzed water samples within Northern region was below detection limit of the instrument. Nitrite concentration in Southern region of Zanzibar Island ranged between BDL to 2.981mg/L. Mean nitrite level was 0.16 mg/L. In all water samples, the concentrations of nitrite were in an accepted WHO guideline (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850382228">Figure 9</xref>). </p>
        <fig id="idm1850382228">
          <label>Figure 9.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Nitrite in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image9.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841955212">
        <title>Electrical Conductivity (EC) and TDS</title>
        <p>Within Northern region, the levels of electrical conductivity (EC) in water samples was in the range of 260 to 1250 µS/cm, while in Southern region of Zanzibar, electrical conductivity ranged between 224 to 3980 µS/cm. Mean levels of electrical conductivity was 900.32 µS/cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850378700">Figure 10</xref>). About 14% and 20% of analyzed water samples from North and South regions respectively had EC levels above WHO (1000 µS/cm) guideline. For TDS, highest levels of TDS were from respective site number 4 and 20 of Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850378700">Figure 10</xref> &amp; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850380140">Figure 11</xref>). </p>
        <fig id="idm1850378700">
          <label>Figure 10.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of EC in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image10.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <fig id="idm1850380140">
          <label>Figure 11.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of TDS in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image11.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841916156">
        <title>pH, Eh, and ORP</title>
        <p>pH in Northern region, the levels of pH  in water samples ranged between 6.58 to 7.36, while in Southern region of Zanzibar, pH ranged between 6.85 to 8.17(<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850377836">Figure 12</xref>). All analyzed water samples (from both regions) were within WHO recommended range of 6.5 to 8.5. Remarkably, water samples from Northern region of Zanzibar were more acidic (low pH values) compared to those from Southern region. Contrarily, water samples from Northern region of Zanzibar have higher electrical potential when compared to samples from Southern region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850374956">Figure 13</xref>). Meanwhile, both lowest and highest level of ORP in analyzed water was witnessed in 8 and 10 of North region of Zanzibar Island The higher the value of ORP indicates the water is in more oxidative condition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850373300">Figure 14</xref>). Systems with the highest ORP values are believed to be in contact with the atmosphere and are likely to contain shallow or even young ground water. </p>
        <fig id="idm1850377836">
          <label>Figure 12.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of pH in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar  Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image12.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <fig id="idm1850374956">
          <label>Figure 13.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of Eh in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island</title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image13.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
        <fig id="idm1850373300">
          <label>Figure 14.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Levels of ORP in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island </title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image14.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec id="idm1841911260">
        <title>Eh &amp; pH Correlation</title>
        <p>There was a negative correlation between Eh and  pH of analyzed water samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="idm1850371428">Figure 15</xref>) </p>
        <fig id="idm1850371428">
          <label>Figure 15.</label>
          <caption>
            <title> Eh and pH correlation in Northern and Southern region of Zanzibar Island </title>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="images/image15.jpg" mime-subtype="jpg"/>
        </fig>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841911044" sec-type="conclusions">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>Generally, almost all the measured parameters were within the WHO guidelines for drinking water. However, for nitrate (7%) and bromide (10.3%) exceeded the WHO limit respectively. The finding suggests for the establishment of guidelines, which outline better management framework for safe drinking water that comprises important key good health preventive components.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="idm1841912556">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>The authors of this manuscript would like to express thanks to His Majesty Government of Brunei Darussalam for funding this project, the State University of Zanzibar for permission for study leave. Special thanks to the staff of the faculty of Science of University Brunei Darussalam for their assistance. To mention few are, Hjh Faridah, Azzlin, Hjh Rasiah, Hj Jamil, Najib, and other UBD chemistry laboratory staffs for providing the necessary facilities and technical support they offer for the successful completion of the project. </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ridm1849719980">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Etu-Efeotor</surname>
            <given-names>J O</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Hydrochemical Analysis Surface and Groundwater of Gwagwalada Area of Central Nigeria</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>1998</year>
          </date>
          <source>Global Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>153</fpage>
          <lpage>162</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1849722140">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Elhag</surname>
            <given-names>A B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>New Diagram Useful for Classification of Groundwater Quality</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2016</year>
          </date>
          <source>British Journal of Earth Sciences Research</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <issue>4</issue>
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          <lpage>54</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1849731508">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>AJ</surname>
            <given-names>M Abdul</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Ibrahim</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            <given-names>H L</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Khamis</surname>
            <given-names>S A</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Mbwana KH(2016) An Index Approach to Metallic Pollution in Groundwater Sources of South Region of Pemba Island</article-title>
          <source>Science Journal of Analytical Chemistry</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          <issue>2</issue>
          <fpage>12</fpage>
          <lpage>21</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1849826612">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Shukla</surname>
            <given-names>D P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Dubey</surname>
            <given-names>C S</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            <given-names>N P</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Tajbakhsh</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Chaudhry</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Sources and controls of Arsenic contamination in groundwater of Rajnandgaon and Kanker District, Chattisgarh Central India</article-title>
          <date>
            <year>2010</year>
          </date>
          <source>Journal of Hydrology395(1-2):</source>
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          <lpage>66</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ridm1849574644">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation xlink:type="simple" publication-type="journal">
          <name>
            <surname>Yidana</surname>
            <given-names>S M</given-names>
          </name>
          <name>
            <surname>Yakubo</surname>
            <given-names>B B</given-names>
          </name>
          <article-title>Akabzaa TM (2010) Analysis of groundwater quality using multivariate and spatial analyses in the Keta basin</article-title>
          <source>Ghana. Journal of African Earth Sciences</source>
          <volume>58</volume>
          <fpage>220</fpage>
          <lpage>234</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
